Sponsored By

HHFKA had significant nutrition impact on school meals

Among other findings, milk and veggies are the reimbursable meal components most likely to be tossed in the trash, and the average school food authority operates at a small deficit.

Mike Buzalka, Executive Features Editor

April 26, 2019

3 Min Read
kid_cafe_food.jpg
XiXinXing/ iStock / Getty Images Plus

The nutritional quality of National School Lunch program (NSLP) lunches and School Breakfast Program (SPB) breakfasts increased “significantly” between the 2009-10 and 2014-15 school years, reflecting the initial impact of the Healthy Hunger-Free Kids Act (HHFKA) of 2010, which began going into effect in the 2012-13 school year. Those were some of the conclusions of a recently released report from the Food & Nutrition Service of the USDA that presented findings from the School Nutrition and Meal Cost Study (SNMCS), the first comprehensive, nationally representative study of the school meal programs since HHFKA was implemented.

Unlike prior studies of school meal programs, SNMCS simultaneously examined the nutritional quality of school meals and the cost of producing those meals, assessed students’ acceptance of school meals in a quantitative way using plate waste data and examined associations between areas such as the nutritional quality of school meals, student participation and cost.

In the area of plate waste during NSLP lunches, it was highest for vegetables with an average of 31% being wasted, followed by milk (29%), fruits and 100% fruit juices (26%), and separate or side grains/breads (23%). Mean levels of waste were lower for desserts and other menu items (20%) and lowest for entrées (16%) and meats/meat alternates (14%).

Related:5 things: Could Child Nutrition Reauthorization be in the works?

For each type of food, the mean proportion wasted was higher in elementary schools than in middle or high schools. The study authors suggest one reason for this may be the offer versus serve (OVS) option, which is mandatory for high schools but optional at lower level schools, though it did note that 81% of all elementary and middle schools used OVS at lunch, and multivariate analyses found that, at least among elementary schools, use of OVS was associated with significantly lower levels of plate waste.

In the cost area, the study found that in the 2014–15 school year, for the average school food authority (SFA) the mean reported cost to produce a reimbursable lunch was $3.81, compared to the average federal free lunch subsidy of $3.32—an approximately 15% gap—while the cost-to-subsidy shortfall on reimbursable breakfasts was even larger: $2.72 to produce compared to an average subsidy of $1.88, or about a 45% difference.

USDA subsidies, including cash reimbursements and USDA foods, accounted for an average of 63% of total SFA revenues, with student payments for reimbursable meals representing about 20% and la carte and other non-reimbursable food sales accounted for 11%. Overall, for the average SFA, total revenues covered 97% of total reported costs, indicating that the average SFA operated at a small deficit.

Related:USDA: 95 percent of districts have met HHFKA requirements

Among other findings, the study noted that there was a positive and statistically significant association between student participation in the NSLP and the nutritional quality of those lunches, but not between the nutritional quality of NSLP lunches and the nutritional quality of the overall diets of students who consumed the lunches.

There was also no significant association between reported cost per NSLP lunch and the nutritional quality of the meals, nor between revenue as a percentage of reported cost and compliance with updated nutrition standards for NSLP lunches.

Most of the data used in this study was collected between January and June 2015 from 518 SFAs representing more than 1,200 schools, 2,165 students and 1,850 parents. In addition, plate waste observations were completed for 6,253 lunch trays in 165 schools and 3,601 breakfast trays in 154 schools.

About the Author

Mike Buzalka

Executive Features Editor, Food Management

Mike Buzalka is executive features editor for Food Management and contributing editor to Restaurant Hospitality, Supermarket News and Nation’s Restaurant News. On Food Management, Mike has lead responsibility for compiling the annual Top 50 Contract Management Companies as well as the K-12, College, Hospital and Senior Dining Power Players listings. He holds bachelor’s and master’s degrees in English Literature from John Carroll University. Before joining Food Management in 1998, he served as for eight years as assistant editor and then editor of Foodservice Distributor magazine. Mike’s personal interests range from local sports such as the Cleveland Indians and Browns to classic and modern literature, history and politics.

Mike Buzalka’s areas of expertise include operations, innovation and technology topics in onsite foodservice industry markets like K-12 Schools, Higher Education, Healthcare and Business & Industry.

Mike Buzalka’s experience:

Executive Features Editor, Food Management magazine (2010-present)

Contributing Editor, Restaurant Hospitality, Supermarket News and Nation’s Restaurant News (2016-present)

Associate Editor, Food Management magazine (1998-2010)

Editor, Foodservice Distributor magazine (1997-1998)

Assistant Editor, Foodservice Distributor magazine (1989-1997)

 

Subscribe to FoodService Director Newsletters
Get the foodservice industry news and insights you need for success, right in your inbox.

You May Also Like