Sponsored By

Supreme Court blocks Biden administration's employee vaccine mandate

The matter isn't settled because of pending deliberations at the circuit-court level, but the nation's highest court said it anticipates the requirement to be shot down.

Peter Romeo, Editor at Large

January 13, 2022

2 Min Read
covid-19 vaccine
Photo: Shutterstock

The U.S. Supreme Court has blocked the enactment of President Biden’s employee vaccine mandate, sparing foodservice operations and other businesses that employ at least 100 people from having to demand either proof of inoculation or weekly negative COVID-19 tests from each worker. 

The court said it agreed with plaintiffs’ arguments that the Occupational Health and Safety Administration (OSHA) does not have the authority to adopt and enforce such a sweeping and unprecedented requirement.  

It noted that it expects a lower court currently deliberating over the initiative’s legality to reach the same conclusion, a move that would effectively kill the mandate. 

If the court had agreed with the Biden administration’s defense argument, restaurant companies and other employers of at least 100 people would have been required to check vaccination or COVID test results starting Feb. 9.  

The [Department of Labor] Secretary has ordered 84 million Americans to either obtain a COVID–19 vaccine or undergo weekly medical testing at their own expense,” the unsigned Supreme Court decision read. “This is no ‘everyday exercise of federal power.’” 

While OSHA has the statutory authority and mandate to protect workers, the decision explained, that power does not extend to setting significant requirements for employees who just happen to work for larger companies. 

The Supreme Court took on the case on an emergency basis last Friday because of the looming Feb. 9 implementation date. Although the questions posed by the court's six conservative justices in emergency hearing led many veteran legal analysts to predict the requirement would be scuttled, others read the lack of action before Monday, the start date of the requirement, as an indication that the court might not block adoption. 

This afternoon's decision removes the considerable uncertainty that has hovered over the issue since Biden proposed the sweeping mandate on Sept. 9. Almost immediately, more than a dozen states filed lawsuits challenging the measure's legality and constitutionality. They were joined by a variety of trade associations and at least one restaurant operator. 

About the Author

Peter Romeo

Editor at Large

Peter Romeo has covered the restaurant industry since 1984 for a variety of media. As Editor At Large for Restaurant Business, his current beats are government affairs, labor and family dining. He is also the publication's unofficial historian.  

Subscribe to FoodService Director Newsletters
Get the foodservice industry news and insights you need for success, right in your inbox.

You May Also Like