Sponsored By

Judge lets FSDs get confidential help from anti-union pros

Enforcement of a measure requiring employers to disclose conversations with labor consultants during unionization drives has been blocked temporarily until a pending lawsuit is decided.

Peter Romeo, Editor at Large

June 28, 2016

1 Min Read
FoodService Director logo in a gray background | FoodService Director

A federal judge has temporarily blocked enactment of a Department of Labor ruling that would have required FSDs and other employers to disclose any discussions they hold with consultants on how to avoid being unionized.

The so-called persuader rule was scheduled to go into effect on Friday.

A lawsuit challenging the rule was filed in Texas by several business groups, which contend that the rule’s real intention is to discourage small businesses from seeking professional help in their efforts to avoid being unionized.

Outside of court, other groups have blasted the rule as the equivalent of requiring businesses to provide unions with their game plan for remaining union-free.

The rule extends to conversations with attorneys, which opponents characterized as a way of undermining attorney-client confidentiality.

Judge Sam Cummings said yesterday in an 86-page decision that the business community was at risk of “irreparable harm” from enactment of the persuader rule. He also noted that the plaintiffs in the lawsuit before the District Court for the Northern District of Texas had a chance of winning. He granted an injunction against enforcement of the persuader rule until the case is decided.

About the Author

Peter Romeo

Editor at Large

Peter Romeo has covered the restaurant industry since 1984 for a variety of media. As Editor At Large for Restaurant Business, his current beats are government affairs, labor and family dining. He is also the publication's unofficial historian.  

Subscribe to FoodService Director Newsletters
Get the foodservice industry news and insights you need for success, right in your inbox.