Sponsored By

House passes bill to delay overtime rules

A measure passed yesterday along party lines would grant foodservice operators and other employers a six-month extension to contend with the new regulations.

Peter Romeo, Editor at Large

September 29, 2016

1 Min Read
FoodService Director logo in a gray background | FoodService Director

The U.S. House of Representatives voted last night to delay adoption of pending overtime pay rules by six months, pushing back the start date to June 1.

The measure has yet to be taken up by the full Senate, and President Obama has already issued a statement promising to veto the legislation. Yet the vote last night was hailed as a victory for restaurants and other small businesses by such groups as the National Restaurant Association.

“We are grateful that Congress stood with small business and passed the Regulatory Relief for Small Businesses, Schools, and Nonprofits Act,” the NRA said in a statement. “We continue to work with key senators on both sides of the aisle to find a resolution in both houses.”

Hopes for a delay in the Senate were buoyed by the partisan vote in the House. The delay measure was passed nearly along party lines, 246-177. The Republican Party also controls the Senate.

The vote in the House came on the same day Congress overrode President Obama’s veto of a bill allowing U.S. citizens to sue Saudi Arabia for damages relating to 9/11. The two-thirds vote marked the first time Congress has overturned an Obama veto.

The new overtime rules, issued by the Department of Labor earlier this year, are scheduled to take effect on Dec. 1. The regulatory change doubles the threshold that determines which salaried employees would be entitled to time-and-a-half pay for work exceeding 40 hours per week. Anyone on salary who earns less than $47,476 on an annual basis would be eligible for the higher pay. The threshold is currently $23,660.

Related:How operators are bracing for new overtime rules

Twenty-one states recently joined forces to challenge the rules in court, arguing against the use of salary as the test of eligibility. 

About the Author

Peter Romeo

Editor at Large

Peter Romeo has covered the restaurant industry since 1984 for a variety of media. As Editor At Large for Restaurant Business, his current beats are government affairs, labor and family dining. He is also the publication's unofficial historian.  

Subscribe to FoodService Director Newsletters
Get the foodservice industry news and insights you need for success, right in your inbox.

You May Also Like